The way that journalists cover the news today has to do with.
Education: In the 60s, lefties took over the universities and have been spewing cultural Marxist drivel to prospective journos ever since. The concept of my and your truth rather than the truth is the way they have been taught to think.
Fear of not conforming. Straying too far from the general consensus may mean not being invited to the best parties and dinners at best and being canceled for a word out of place.
Pandering to an audience: Journalists, who essentially live in a bubble, pander to and are scared of the rowdy minority. If they bucked the trend and catered to the Quiet Australian, they would find a much bigger audience.
As an example Senior Journalists in conservative papers in Australia couch criticism of Biden and the Democrat party in soft tones while going total feral when describing Trump, Nigel Farage, and others of the "far-right".
This is even though conservatives make peace agreements rather than start wars and facilitate vaccinations that save millions of lives rather than denigrate early potential covid-19 solutions such as hydroxychloroquine, which could have saved millions but it didn't suite their narrative.
What Sujatha Fernandes is teaching young students at Sydney University is a provable lie. How can Australia ever succeed when academics at our top universities simply make things up and are allowed to get away with it.It seems that if something fits the far left's narrative, there can be no peer review because the sword of “cancellation” hangs over the heads of dissenters. This is how the myth of global warming is allowed to destroy our economy and the myth that men can have babies is allowed to destroy our morals and the lives of many of our children.People who convince our children of the lie that democratic Israelis are butchers and Hamas are simply benign folk need to be rooted out and fired.
The Trump case creates a deep disillusionment with the U.S. legal system and has destroyed any perception of truth or integrity in it.
The handling of this situation is a fundamental betrayal of the principles of impartial justice, to the point where one can no longer feel safe or confident in engaging with American institutions while the current administration is in power.
Under these circumstances, mistrust in the FBI creates a reluctance to set foot in the country. It underscores the depth of concern about the erosion of the rule of law and the politicization of the justice system. It's a stark reminder of how profoundly damaging the perception of bias and manipulation in legal proceedings can be to the social fabric and to individual faith in the government.
The loss of trust in the institutions meant to uphold justice and protect citizens' rights is a grave matter beyond any one case or political moment. It strikes at the heart of the social contract and the stability of a ...
In today's world, one of the most frightening realities is the ease with which individuals in positions of authority or those who command respect through their demeanor can deceive us without fear of repercussions. These influential figures, be they heads of universities, politicians, or journalists, seem to have no qualms about fabricating narratives that support their agenda, knowing full well that they will face no consequences for their dishonesty.
The problem is compounded by the fact that those who should be holding these individuals accountable often turn a blind eye to their deception. University administrators, for example, may choose to ignore academics who blatantly lie as long as their falsehoods serve to bolster the institution's reputation or further its goals. Similarly, politicians and journalists, despite having access to the truth through briefings and research, may opt to perpetuate lies that align with their political or ideological leanings.
The result is a culture of ...
