Australia can avoid the economic downside of the current and imminent global turmoil by repealing the green tape preventing the full exploitation of natural gas, coal, oil, and uranium that is so abundant in Australia. This can be done on security, environmental and economic grounds.
China, which is our number one threat, creates more pollution than the US and Europe combined, yet does not have to commence reducing emissions under the Paris Accord until 2030. This is by design and means that even if Australia moved to zero-carbon overnight, it would have no impact at all.
One cannot help but wonder why this was allowed to happen It was certainly by design rather than merely by chance and the architects of this outcome knew exactly who they wanted to benefit.
Rather than let the US and Europe import dirty oil, coal, gas, etc from Venezuela, Iran, Russia, and Saudi Arabia, where there are few curbs on pollution, let them import it from Australia. The positive environmental, economic, and security implications will be immense.
The fact that the left won't even allow discussion on the subject shows that they have an agenda that they do not want to defend,
What Sujatha Fernandes is teaching young students at Sydney University is a provable lie. How can Australia ever succeed when academics at our top universities simply make things up and are allowed to get away with it.It seems that if something fits the far left's narrative, there can be no peer review because the sword of “cancellation” hangs over the heads of dissenters. This is how the myth of global warming is allowed to destroy our economy and the myth that men can have babies is allowed to destroy our morals and the lives of many of our children.People who convince our children of the lie that democratic Israelis are butchers and Hamas are simply benign folk need to be rooted out and fired.
The Trump case creates a deep disillusionment with the U.S. legal system and has destroyed any perception of truth or integrity in it.
The handling of this situation is a fundamental betrayal of the principles of impartial justice, to the point where one can no longer feel safe or confident in engaging with American institutions while the current administration is in power.
Under these circumstances, mistrust in the FBI creates a reluctance to set foot in the country. It underscores the depth of concern about the erosion of the rule of law and the politicization of the justice system. It's a stark reminder of how profoundly damaging the perception of bias and manipulation in legal proceedings can be to the social fabric and to individual faith in the government.
The loss of trust in the institutions meant to uphold justice and protect citizens' rights is a grave matter beyond any one case or political moment. It strikes at the heart of the social contract and the stability of a ...
In today's world, one of the most frightening realities is the ease with which individuals in positions of authority or those who command respect through their demeanor can deceive us without fear of repercussions. These influential figures, be they heads of universities, politicians, or journalists, seem to have no qualms about fabricating narratives that support their agenda, knowing full well that they will face no consequences for their dishonesty.
The problem is compounded by the fact that those who should be holding these individuals accountable often turn a blind eye to their deception. University administrators, for example, may choose to ignore academics who blatantly lie as long as their falsehoods serve to bolster the institution's reputation or further its goals. Similarly, politicians and journalists, despite having access to the truth through briefings and research, may opt to perpetuate lies that align with their political or ideological leanings.
The result is a culture of ...
